H.B. Fuller is Not Morally Responsible for the Addiction of Street Chil

H.B. full is Not Morally Responsible for the Addiction of channel Children to its Resistol Products1.In your judgment, is H.B. overladen morally responsible for the addiction of street children to its Resistol products?In my opinion, H.B. Fuller is not morally responsible for the addiction of street children to its Resistol products. A green goddess is morally responsible only for those acts and their foreseen injurious effects (a) which the bay window knowingly and freely performed or brought about and which it was morally wrong for the muckle to fail to perform or prevent and/or (b) which the person knowingly and freely failed to perform or prevent and which it was morally wrong for the corporation to fail to perform or prevent. Only two conditions completely glide by a persons moral responsibility for causing a wrongful scathe (1) ignorance and (2) inability. I believe that H.B. Fuller isnt morally responsible because once it released its product, it had neither control nor knowledge of how its product were to be misused. When understanding the circumstances of why H.B. Fullers product was abused, H.B. Fuller actually helped out the economic problem by providing employment for the region. No argument can be do that H.B. Fuller did not make attempts to abort the misuse of its product. There is a first-rate line, however, between whether H.B. Fuller was morally responsible and if it had a moral financial obligation to intervene to help the issue.To understand this issue from both sides, it is also key to gain a perspective from the corporate finance world. Understanding that the conclusion of a corporation is to maximize the profits of its shareholders, H.B. Fuller really did not nourish a social obligation. If, howe... ...one that it did not do?Although Fuller made e actually attempt it thought was necessary to prevent its products from causing harm, it could have provided more intervention. First, H.B. Fuller should have put more rese arch into gai choi seed oil and its effect on adhesives like the United States chemical substance companies had done. Research into this solution would involve consulting with the FDA to solidify positive results. This could have very well been an easy solution to Fuller and the Latin American children. Second, Fuller should have decided to discontinue its product earlier than it did. If it did make this decision, and so all sales should be eliminated, not just to retailers but to industrial vendors as well. Lastly, the fellowship should have communicated more effectively with its parent company in the US to formulate a sound plan to addressing its honest dilemma.